hushvault vs DEVONthink

DEVONthink is the deepest document manager on the Mac, and it earned that reputation over two decades. hushvault is not trying to out-feature it — it's built on a different idea: your library should be a plain folder. This page is honest about what that trade buys you and what it costs.

← back to hushvault

Where DEVONthink wins

If those are the features you live in, buy DEVONthink — it's excellent software.

Where hushvault wins

Scale, measured rather than promised: against a generated test vault of 10,000 notes, 12,000 wikilinks and 200 PDFs on an M1 Mac, a full cold index takes about 8 seconds, relaunching with no changes about 0.1s, and an edit is searchable in about 0.1s. OCR of scanned documents queues separately, at roughly 50 pages a minute on the same machine.

Annotating a PDF in hushvault: the highlights live in a small JSON file beside the document, not inside a database — so they move with the file and are readable without us.

The philosophical difference

DEVONthink asks you to bring your documents into it, and pays you back with intelligence about them. hushvault refuses to own your documents at all: it opens a folder you already have, adds search, links, tags, highlights, and PDF tools on top, and can be deleted without leaving a scratch. Which trade is right depends on how much you want to depend on any one app — including this one.

Try the folder-first way

hushvault is pay-what-you-want during the beta and takes about a minute to try: download it, click Create a sample library, and poke around — the sample is just a folder too. Get hushvault, or read the promises it's built on first.

Using Windows? See a DEVONthink alternative for Windows.